In an age of constant and pervasive overskilling, which is essentially the phenomenon whereby a worker’s skill is being underutilised by their employer, it is evident that the traditional ways of learning are being gradually outmoded.
We have reached a stage of human development where more young people today are educated than in any previous generation, and this, too, has altered perceptions of what it means to be ‘successful’ and created a stigma around not choosing this ‘right path’. The reality is that today we live in an era of unprecedented learning opportunities with countless career paths, yet this has not been used properly, which has frankly been a disservice to society.
Of course, with the recent rise in upskilling and adult learning, many individuals have pursued further education options like going to study an online MBA course at Melbourne Business School Online. This offers a practical pathway for professional growth in business and leadership without disrupting current commitments. A common trait among these courses is that they do not follow the traditional classroom model and are accessible to almost all.
What most people are looking for is success in their careers, and this means financial stability while having the ability to enjoy and feel fulfilled in one’s life and community; this is very different to seeking shiny university degrees and aligning with what we traditionally define as being the socially established ‘right path’ and the ‘good job’ over being happy with the choices we made.
It is evident that there needs to be a redefinition of what we see as the ‘right path’ and the ‘good job’, and a shake-off of the rigid view that a successful life can only be pursued in the traditional classroom.
Table of Contents
Traditional Classrooms in a Brave New World
Our world has undergone unprecedented changes, yet our views on raising the next generation have remained dogmatic, clinging to a one-size-fits-all approach from a bygone age. From the sidelining of vocational education, which largely began with the rise of what was known as the ‘yuppie’ class (young urban professionals or the professional managerial class) from the 1980s and 1990s and parents imposing on their children to seek white-collar jobs and university degrees.
Too, seeing standardised testing as the ultimate be-all and end-all litmus test for deciding whether one can ‘make it’ in their adult life, all things point to the exigency of recalibrating how we guide young people towards success and fulfilment.
The reality we face today is that the way children learn and respond today is as diverse as ever, with varying needs, demands and challenges they face throughout their learning journey; and this has largely been due to the unprecedented and unforeseen societal shifts we have experienced throughout the decades, whether that be the rise in digital technologies or globalisation.
Each child has a unique way of living, knowing, being and doing that emerges from the continuously changing social and cultural milieu they are coming from. Traditional approaches to learning and classroom management evidently are falling short of this, creating a cutthroat rat race towards nowhere of outmoded expectations, rather than a pathway based on true accessibility and equitable opportunities for everyone to succeed in line with their ability, goals, aspirations, and needs. Let’s look at a few reasons why success need not always be from the so-called ‘traditional classroom’.
The Classroom Dynamic
From overpopulated classrooms and overworked teachers, it severely limits the capacity to provide individualised attention. Inevitably, it leads to the implementation of a one-size-fits-all model for delivering education, which then rigidly overlooks the diverse ways the young minds process information, e.g. auditory learners who may learn best in lecture-heavy environments, visual learners who need visualisations of content, or kinesthetic learners who thrive best with hands-on activities but feel severely restricted by traditional classroom desk-based learning.
Young people who need more tailored instruction are constantly at risk of being left behind in such an environment, which leads to the perception by society at large through deficit discourses that these students are ‘unsuccessful’ because they did not follow the one-way street that was given to them; when in reality, it is aggressive adoption of these outmoded learning models which have not aligned with their natural learning inclinations and thus closing all viable pathways for them.
Contrarily, inclusive and adjusted learning environments can be far more attentive to learners who need to move at their own pace, along with personalised instruction forms that adapt to them.
Learning Differences
There is a misconception that everyone is suddenly diagnosed with a learning disorder or disability, but these have always existed. Increased research and awareness have highlighted that about 1 in 20 Australians have ADHD, 10% have dyslexia, and 3-6% have dyscalculia.
While research into children’s learning differences has improved, traditional classroom models and standardised testing often exacerbate these challenges due to a lack of resources, training, and flexibility, which institutions often sideline.
Learning differences don’t prevent success; they require different methods of content delivery. For example, a Year 10 student with ADHD might lose motivation for tertiary education and benefit from alternative pathways like VET. Research shows that ADHD students are 11 times more likely to be unemployed or out of school, indicating that the system is failing them.
Variety, Variety, Variety
Ultimately, success can be achieved anywhere. While traditional classes offer a wide range of courses, their limited enrollment often restricts access. For adult learners looking to upskill or change careers, online, hybrid, and alternative learning options provide abundant opportunities to succeed beyond conventional settings.
